Book Review: Qin Bo-Wei 秦柏未
For those of you who hate overwrought book reviews, I’m going to make this easy on you. When I wrote to Jason Blalack about his work on the recently released Qin Bo-Wei’s 56 Treatment Methods: Writing Precise Prescriptions, my subject line read “Kid in a Candy Store”. But keep reading, Herbalists, because you deserve to know more.

The Introduction to 56 Methods is about as juicy as you’ll find in contemporary writing on Chinese Medicine. Blalack explains that the project began when he asked his mentor, Wu Bo-Ping, a direct student of Dr Qin, what the most important untranslated text in medicine was. Like something from Indiana Jones’ satchel, a dusty tome emerges and Blalack is handed the core of the present work. Consistent with this incantatory air, he engages us not only as the book’s lucid translator, but as a kind of diviner - bringing light, clarity, and however quietly, a call to action as he presents the work of legendary and neglected herbalist Qin Bo-Wei.
During a recent discussion on reevaluating Shang Han and Wen Bing theories, Volker Scheid called Qin Bo-Wei the “modern architect” of herbal prescribing. This is a particularly apt description because 56 Methods is indeed a framework, one on which a straightforward and expansive approach to herbal customization can be built. Blalack explains that Qin Bo-Wei “…extracted these treatment methods from classical formulas. They are templates, which allow the physician a way to emulate the thinking behind a prescription without being tied down to the exact ingredients or original indications,” and, “…give[s] one the ability to think flexibly and modify classic ideas (formulas) for the modern patient.”(xvi). This includes using fewer ingredients and smaller doses per formula, making this a momentous new resource for those seeking fresh approaches to modification.
There is a preponderance of debate regarding the use of established formularies these days, out of which this question often emerges: do substantial modifications of the classics approach a kind of hubris, or should we consistently endeavor to improve upon them as we attempt to more fully treat each patient? If we listen to Qin Bo-Wei and begin with unfettered diagnosis, the relative length of formulas becomes immaterial (though it should be said that with the use of his ideas they are almost certain to become shorter). This tactic certainly isn’t novel, but there persists a tendency in new and seasoned practitioners to unwittingly subvert core strategies with ill-considered layers, meaning earnest efforts to address individual symptoms can sometimes produce formulas that are as murky as their decoctions. But practitioners who invest due time in using the 56 Methods properly will gain the ability to generate treatments reflecting the true essence of it’s “precision”: formulas that are both structurally elegant and fluid.

That Blalack places as much importance on the comfortable language of his presentation as he does the book’s concepts proves a genuine desire for the material to be used. For this reader, one of the frequent disappointments of publications on Chinese Medicine, particularly those involving translation, is what sometimes seems self-serving attempts by authors to match the pithiness of their sources. This is to some degree understandable since works typically upheld as classics are of an entirely different time and stylistically minimal (Blalack prefers “terse” [xv]), but subservience to long gone scribes can leave new output unnecessarily dry, difficult to access, and wastefully shelf-bound. The remedy and privilege we experience in 56 Methods is a refreshingly conversational style that shows deep respect for all serious learners, at every level of study.
The most valuable example of this is the inclusion of a Q & A section after every formula. Among the many things Blalack’s questions to Wu Bo-Ping are capable: making the proper use of individual herbs easier to remember, reenforcing key concepts without excessive and distracting summary, and illuminating prevalent theoretical misconceptions about patterns and techniques. In the section on Wind he asks, “How can the same formula treat both a wind-cold and wind-heat presentation, and what does that mean?” (149); about a formula in the section on Dryness, “Why is he zi recommended for dry and hoarse voice instead of other typical herbs like wu wei zi and mu hu die?” (233); and more fundamentally, on Deficiency, “Can you have Spleen deficiency without dampness?” (123). This plainspoken style pervades the entire work, invokes tradition without perverting it, and more importantly underscores the great spirit of learning itself: to ask without fear and to grow as a teacher by offering better answers.
In addition to the way the way this work is framed – it’s uncluttered design and logical sequence - there are many smaller treasures to be appreciated in 56 Methods, all of which are made more powerful because they are offered in-context: substitutions for hard to find herbs; food therapies that can enhance the effectiveness of treatment methods and formulas; references to other theories when they can beget useful comparison; instructions on supplementary uses of herbs, such as moxa cakes; and indexes that actually take you to the concepts (not just the words) you’re looking for. Likewise, the appendices are substantially fleshed out but do not attempt to become books in themselves, and explanations of pao zhi, or specially prepared herbs, are coherently interwoven with discussions of the formulas (where many texts may only mention the names of these herbs among formulas’ other constituents).
My own copy of Qin Bo-Wei’s 56 Treatment Methods, now just a few months old, is already becoming tattered and has quickly risen above the flotsam of the usual “standards”, ones upon which so many of our current ideas about Chinese herbalism are based. I likewise hope that all those invested in this field give the 56 Methods a prominent place - not only on their bookshelves but in the application of their art.
Order now from Amazon or Eastland Press
——-
(*) On the second image in this post, Willem de Kooning’s Excavation, 1950: If you’ve read this blog before you’ll know something of my predilection for comparing most everything to art. In this case, I found it unthinkable not to include an image by Willem de Kooning, a New York School abstractionist working at the same time as Qin Bo-Wei. As unaware of each others’ work as they most surely were, both de Kooning and Qin breathed new life into classical structures by seeing through them - realizing the potential of those frameworks to be effective in ways they hadn’t been before and by stripping down the pillars that history had applied to their respective crafts. Stylistically, de Kooning immediately jumped to mind because of his architectural approach to the canvas - one that appears deceptively loose in that a great deal of time was spent in establishing the foundation of his outwardly graceful works.
——-
All parenthetical references above from: Blalack, Jason, Ed. Qin Bo-Wei’s 56 Treatment Methods: Writing Precise Prescriptions. Seattle: Eastland Press. 2010.
——-
©Great Wave, LLC, 2011. No part of this article may be reproduced without the express permission of Great Wave, LLC.

















